Synopsys, Inc. v. USDOL
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. |
| 20-16414 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Streamlined request [12] by Appellant Synopsys, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Synopsys, Inc. opening brief due 10/26/2020. Appellee U.S. Department of Labor answering brief due 11/25/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11827565] (DLM) [Entered: 09/17/2020 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. New requested due date is 10/26/2020. [11827498] [20-16414] (Loeb, Robert) [Entered: 09/17/2020 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding these appeals, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11809859] [20-16414, 20-16416, 20-16538] (VS) [Entered: 09/01/2020 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) to consolidate is denied. No. 20-16414 will proceed separately from cross-appeal Nos. 20-16416 and 20-16538 but will be calendared before the same panel assigned to consider the merits of these appeals. The opening brief remains due September 24, 2020. The answering brief is due October 26, 2020. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11808100] (AF) [Entered: 08/31/2020 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Casen Ross for party(s) Appellee USDOL, in case 20-16414. [11807368] (CW) [Entered: 08/31/2020 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Casen B. Ross (U.S. Department of Justice - Civil Appellate Staff 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20530) for Appellee USDOL. Date of service: 08/31/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11807349] [20-16414] (Ross, Casen) [Entered: 08/31/2020 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Synopsys, Inc. Motion to consolidate cases Nos. 20-16414, 20-16416, 20-16538. Date of service: 08/19/2020. [11795143] [20-16414] (Loeb, Robert) [Entered: 08/19/2020 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert M. Loeb (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, 1152 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005) for Appellant Synopsys, Inc.. Date of service: 08/19/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11795132] [20-16414] (Loeb, Robert) [Entered: 08/19/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Synopsys, Inc. Correspondence: transcript designation. Date of service: 08/11/2020 [11784936] [20-16414] (Loeb, Robert) [Entered: 08/11/2020 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/19/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11778038] (VS) [Entered: 08/05/2020 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/30/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11771973]. [20-16414] (AD) [Entered: 07/30/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Synopsys, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/30/2020. [11771867] [20-16414] (Loeb, Robert) [Entered: 07/30/2020 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Synopsys, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/30/2020. Appellant Synopsys, Inc. opening brief due 09/24/2020. Appellee U.S. Department of Labor answering brief due 10/26/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11763136] (RT) [Entered: 07/23/2020 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Synopsys, Inc. v. USDOL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Johann |
| Represented By: | Casen Ross |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SYNOPSYS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Robert Loeb |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Uriarte Esquire |
| Represented By: | James Anglin Flynn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
