George Betak v. Steven Kuhn, et al
| STEVEN H. KUHN and STEVEN HOWARD KUHN |
| ELECTRIC MOTOR WERKS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ENEL X NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation and VALERY MIFTAKHOV |
| GEORGE BETAK |
| 20-16418 |
| July 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Patent |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMM, WAF and JSB) [12291248] (RR) [Entered: 11/18/2021 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE): Appellees motion to dismiss this appeal as moot is granted (Docket Entry No. [ # 12 ]). See GTE California, Inc. v. FCC, 39 F.3d 940, 946 (9th Cir. 1994); see also Karcher v. May, 484 U.S. 72, 83 (1987) (vacatur of the district courts order is not appropriate where mootness is caused by circumstances attributable to any of the parties). DISMISSED. [12270817] (AF) [Entered: 10/27/2021 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellee George Betak reply to response (motion to dismiss the case). Date of service: 02/01/2021. [11989061] [20-16418] (Tuffaha, Joedat) [Entered: 02/01/2021 06:11 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn response opposing motion ([ # 12 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 12 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss the case). Date of service: 01/25/2021. [11980890] [20-16418] (Kuhn, Steven) [Entered: 01/25/2021 08:57 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee George Betak Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 01/14/2021. [11964806] [20-16418] (Tuffaha, Joedat) [Entered: 01/14/2021 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 7 ] filed by Steven Howard Kuhn. [11945022] (SD) [Entered: 12/24/2020 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 10 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 8 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn. [11938448] (LA) [Entered: 12/23/2020 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 7 ] submitted by Steven Howard Kuhn is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 8 ] submitted by Steven Howard Kuhn are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11929379] (KWG) [Entered: 12/16/2020 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn. Date of service: 12/15/2020. [11929363]--(Court entered filing, originally filed with brief in [ # 7 ].) (KWG) [Entered: 12/16/2020 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn. Date of service: 12/15/2020. [11929144] [20-16418]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed PDF of the excerpts, filed correctly in [ # 8 ]. 12/16/2020 by KWG] (Kuhn, Steven) [Entered: 12/15/2020 10:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Appellant's Late Motion [ # 5 ] (ECF Filing) to extend time to file opening brief. Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn opening brief due 12/15/2020. Appellees George Betak, Electric Motor Werks, Inc., Enel X North America, Inc. and Valery Miftakhov answering brief due 01/14/2021. The appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the last-served answering brief. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). The appellant is informed that a motion for an extension of time to file a brief should be filed at least seven days before the expiration of the time prescribed for filing the brief. 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [11910572] (TH) [Entered: 12/01/2020 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 12/15/2020. Date of service: 11/30/2020. [11909892] [20-16418] (Kuhn, Steven) [Entered: 11/30/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn opening brief due 11/30/2020. Appellees George Betak, Electric Motor Werks, Inc., Enel X North America, Inc. and Valery Miftakhov answering brief due 12/30/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11850710] (DLM) [Entered: 10/07/2020 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Steven Howard Kuhn. New requested due date is 11/30/2020. [11849994] [20-16418] (Kuhn, Steven) [Entered: 10/06/2020 06:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 07/29/2020. [11771545] (RT) [Entered: 07/30/2020 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 08/20/2020. Transcript due 09/21/2020. Appellant Steven H. Kuhn opening brief due 10/29/2020. Appellees George Betak, Electric Motor Werks, Inc., Enel X North America, Inc. and Valery Miftakhov answering brief due 11/30/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11763603] (RT) [Entered: 07/23/2020 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
