Kim Blandino v. Steve Sisolak, et al
| LINDA BELL, in her administrative and executive capacity as chief judge for Clark County, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as sheriff of Clark County, STEVE SISOLAK, in his official capacity as Governor of Nevada, DAVID BARKER, in his administrative and judicial capacity as senior judge of Clark county, KRIS PICKERING, in her excecutive and administrative capacity as chief justice of the Nevada Supreme Court and AARON FORD, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Nevada |
| KIM BLANDINO |
| 20-16431 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, MMS and CMC) [11779252] (RR) [Entered: 08/06/2020 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) Appellants emergency motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [11770269] (WL) [Entered: 07/29/2020 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kim Blandino petition for panel rehearing (from 07/28/2020 memorandum). Date of service: 07/28/2020. [11769054] [20-16431] (Blandino, Kim) [Entered: 07/28/2020 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partner,s Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The emergency motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. Appellants alternative request to treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). DISMISSED. [11768619] (WL) [Entered: 07/28/2020 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kim Blandino Supplemental Motion to take judicial notice of Date change of date from July 28,2020 to August 4, 2020. Date of service: 07/27/2020. [11768028] [20-16431] (Blandino, Kim) [Entered: 07/27/2020 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kim Blandino EMERGENCY Motion for miscellaneous relief []. Date of service: 07/27/2020. [11767128] [20-16431] (Blandino, Kim) [Entered: 07/27/2020 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kim Blandino opening brief due 09/22/2020. [11766798] (JPD) [Entered: 07/27/2020 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kim Blandino v. Steve Sisolak, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LINDA BELL, in her administrative and executive capacity as chief judge for Clark County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as sheriff of Clark County | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STEVE SISOLAK, in his official capacity as Governor of Nevada | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID BARKER, in his administrative and judicial capacity as senior judge of Clark county | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: KRIS PICKERING, in her excecutive and administrative capacity as chief justice of the Nevada Supreme Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: AARON FORD, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Nevada | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: KIM BLANDINO | |
| Represented By: | Kim Blandino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
