Brick Houston v. Downey, et al
| OFFENDERS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, JOHN CALDWELL and BELAFONTA ESTAVAIL |
| DOE, Officers, Unnamed Ely CERT Transport Turnkeys, ELLISON, DOWNEY, Sgt. and TONY PODESTA |
| BRICK SHALAKO HOUSTON |
| 20-16458 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): On August 4, 2020, this court issued an order directing appellant to the docketing and filing fees for this appeal in the district court, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant has failed to address the fee status issue. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant shall have a second opportunity to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or submit to this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11834183] (CKP) [Entered: 09/23/2020 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11776834] (CKP) [Entered: 08/04/2020 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brick Shalako Houston opening brief due 09/28/2020. [11771738] (JPD) [Entered: 07/30/2020 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
