Walter Goodson v. Perez-Pantoja, et al
| C. FREEMAN, Captain at CTF-Central, SANTIAGO, Associate Warden, K. Z. ALLEN, Appeals Examiner, C. KOENIG, Warden, KELLY, Sgt./Lt. I.S.U. and M. VOONG, Chief Appeal Director |
| PEREZ-PANTOJA, Correctional Officer |
| WALTER CREG GOODSON |
| 20-16468 |
| July 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11815796] (CKP) [Entered: 09/08/2020 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Walter Creg Goodson motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/02/2020. [11814070] (QDL) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 09/02/2020. [Case Number 20-16468: Partially Paid] [11814062] (QDL) [Entered: 09/04/2020 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Walter Creg Goodson motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 01/12/2021. Deficiencies: None. [11813873] (QDL) [Entered: 09/04/2020 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11776841] (CKP) [Entered: 08/04/2020 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Walter Creg Goodson opening brief due 09/14/2020. Appellee Perez-Pantoja answering brief due 10/14/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11772872] (JMR) [Entered: 07/31/2020 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
