Roy Fisher, et al v. Tucson Unified School District, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| SIDNEY L. SUTTON, SIDNEY TAIZE, As Parent, Natural guardian and Next Friend of Jonathan Taize, Lisa Taize and Joshua Taize, AKA Sidney Taiz, SALLY J. SUTTON, As Parents and Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sean Sutton, MARY KATHERINE CENTENO, As Parent, Natural Guardians and Next Friend of Sandra Katherine Centeno and James Lee Centeno, JOHN R. CENTENO and LIBRADA G. RUIZ, As Parent, Natural Guardian and Next Friend of Andres L Ruiz |
| JOYCE BROWN HUTTON, Next of kin of Mondre Hutton, ROY FISHER, MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and on behalf of Stephen Mendoza, VIRGINIA HALL, Next of kin of Kenneth and Lloyd D. Hall, ELIZABETH LEWIS, Next of kin of Elizabeth, Ellen, Warren, and Jeff Lewis, GEORGE HUTTON, BOYD LEWIS, JOSIE FISHER, Next of kin to Elizabeth Fisher, LLOYD D. HALL and EDWARD A. CONTRERAS |
| TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| 20-16485 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellant Tucson Unified School District to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Tucson Unified School District opening brief due 11/02/2020. Appellees Edward A. Contreras, Josie Fisher, Roy Fisher, Lloyd D. Hall, Virginia Hall, George Hutton, Joyce Brown Hutton, Boyd Lewis, Elizabeth Lewis and Maria Mendoza answering brief due 12/02/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11841242] (JN) [Entered: 09/29/2020 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Tucson Unified School District. New requested due date is 11/02/2020. [11841068] [20-16485] (Cooper, Bennett) [Entered: 09/29/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11809883] (VS) [Entered: 09/01/2020 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address this courts jurisdiction to review the orders challenged in this appeal. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 279 (1988) (An order by a federal court that relates only to the conduct or progress of litigation before that court ordinarily is not considered an injunction and therefore is not appealable under 1292(a)(1).); Gon v. First State Ins. Co., 871 F.2d 863, 865-66 (9th Cir. 1989) (observing that an order by a court that regulates the conduct of the litigation, such as an order relating to discovery, is not considered an injunction for purposes of appellate jurisdiction). The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11804612] (JPD) [Entered: 08/27/2020 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/27/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11788476] (VS) [Entered: 08/13/2020 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/11/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11785756]. [20-16485] (AD) [Entered: 08/11/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tucson Unified School District Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/11/2020. [11785695] [20-16485] (Cooper, Bennett) [Entered: 08/11/2020 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tucson Unified School District Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/11/2020. Appellant Tucson Unified School District opening brief due 10/02/2020. Appellees Edward A. Contreras, Josie Fisher, Roy Fisher, Lloyd D. Hall, Virginia Hall, George Hutton, Joyce Brown Hutton, Boyd Lewis, Elizabeth Lewis and Maria Mendoza answering brief due 11/02/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11776477] (JBS) [Entered: 08/04/2020 10:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
