Voodoo SAS v. SayGames, LLC
| VOODOO SAS |
| SAYGAMES, LLC |
| 20-16486 |
| August 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [11811737] (CL) [Entered: 09/02/2020 09:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 09/02/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11795510] (CL) [Entered: 08/19/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/11/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11785755]. [20-16486] (AD) [Entered: 08/11/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Voodoo SAS Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/11/2020. [11785626] [20-16486] (Lin, James) [Entered: 08/11/2020 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney Jaime Ann Santos for Appellant Voodoo SAS, in case 20-16486. [11785528] (HH) [Entered: 08/11/2020 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jaime Santos (Goodwin Procter LLP, 1900 N Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036) for Appellant Voodoo SAS. Date of service: 08/11/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11785507] [20-16486] (Santos, Jaime) [Entered: 08/11/2020 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Voodoo SAS Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/11/2020. Transcript ordered by 09/03/2020. Transcript due 10/05/2020. Appellant Voodoo SAS opening brief due 11/12/2020. Appellee SayGames, LLC answering brief due 12/14/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11776895] (JBS) [Entered: 08/04/2020 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Voodoo SAS v. SayGames, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: VOODOO SAS | |
| Represented By: | James Lin |
| Represented By: | Indra Neel Chatterjee Esquire |
| Represented By: | Daniel Mello |
| Represented By: | Jaime Santos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SAYGAMES, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Whitney Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
