Miguel Ilaw v. Lucy Koh
Defendant / Appellee: LUCY H. KOH, USDC, Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant: MIGUEL ILAW
Case Number: 20-16553
Filed: August 13, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 25, 2021 MIGUEL ILAW V. LUCY KOH

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2020 Filing 8 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 3 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Mr. Miguel Ilaw. [11826848] (LA) [Entered: 09/16/2020 04:42 PM]
September 16, 2020 Filing 7 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 2 ] filed by Mr. Miguel Ilaw. [11826109] (DB) [Entered: 09/16/2020 11:37 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 2 ] submitted by Mr. Miguel Ilaw is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 3 ] submitted by Mr. Miguel Ilaw are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [11821873] (KT) [Entered: 09/14/2020 08:55 AM]
September 11, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Miguel Ilaw initial petition for rehearing en banc. Date of service: 09/11/2020. [11821363]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [4].] (SLM) [Entered: 09/11/2020 04:59 PM]
September 11, 2020 Filing 4 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 5 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Miguel Ilaw Correspondence: Petition for Initial En Banc Hearing. Attached.. Date of service: 09/11/2020 [11821326] [20-16553] (Ilaw, Miguel) [Entered: 09/11/2020 04:40 PM]
September 11, 2020 Filing 3 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Miguel Ilaw. Date of service: 09/11/2020. [11821299] [20-16553] (Ilaw, Miguel) [Entered: 09/11/2020 04:29 PM]
September 11, 2020 Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Miguel Ilaw. Date of service: 09/11/2020. [11821292] [20-16553] (Ilaw, Miguel) [Entered: 09/11/2020 04:26 PM]
August 13, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Miguel Ilaw opening brief due 10/14/2020. [11787595] (RT) [Entered: 08/13/2020 09:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Miguel Ilaw v. Lucy Koh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LUCY H. KOH, USDC, Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MIGUEL ILAW
Represented By: Miguel Ilaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?