Renee Steinaker, et al v. Southwest Airlines Company, et al
Defendant / Appellee: TERRY GRAHAM, RYAN RUSSELL, JANE DOE RUSSELL, JANE DOE GRAHAM and SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, a Texas Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: RENEE STEINAKER and DAVID STEINAKER, a married couple
Case Number: 20-16572
Filed: August 17, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2020 Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LCC) Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11832971] (JMR) [Entered: 09/22/2020 01:47 PM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants David Steinaker and Renee Steinaker Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 09/10/2020. [11818571]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [3].] (SLM) [Entered: 09/10/2020 09:16 AM]
September 9, 2020 Filing 3 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellants David Steinaker and Renee Steinaker response to Court order dated 08/19/2020. Date of service: 09/09/2020. [11818225] [20-16572] (Bouma, Jeff) [Entered: 09/09/2020 04:51 PM]
August 19, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11795497] (JMR) [Entered: 08/19/2020 04:18 PM]
August 17, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants David Steinaker and Renee Steinaker Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/24/2020. Appellants David Steinaker and Renee Steinaker opening brief due 10/20/2020. Appellees Jane Doe Graham, Terry Graham, Jane Doe Russell, Ryan Russell and Southwest Airlines Company answering brief due 11/20/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11790874] (RT) [Entered: 08/17/2020 09:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Renee Steinaker, et al v. Southwest Airlines Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TERRY GRAHAM
Represented By: Dominique Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RYAN RUSSELL
Represented By: Dominique Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE DOE RUSSELL
Represented By: Dominique Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE DOE GRAHAM
Represented By: Dominique Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, a Texas Corporation
Represented By: Peter Prynkiewicz Esquire
Represented By: Robert Shawn Oller Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RENEE STEINAKER
Represented By: Jeff Bouma
Represented By: Larry J. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID STEINAKER, a married couple
Represented By: Jeff Bouma
Represented By: Larry J. Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?