Georgette Purnell v. Equifax Inc., et al
TRANSUNION, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INC. |
GEORGETTE G. PURNELL |
20-16583 |
August 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, JBR and MBC) [11853534] (QDL) [Entered: 10/09/2020 08:24 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11827835] --[COURT UPDATE: To attach Order; resent NDA - 09/17/2020 by HH] (JPD) [Entered: 09/17/2020 01:53 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Georgette G. Purnell motion to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/01/2020. [11823143] (QDL) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:25 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed original and 1 copy of Appellant Georgette G. Purnell opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 09/01/2020. [11821273] (LA) [Entered: 09/11/2020 04:20 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Georgette G. Purnell opening brief due 10/13/2020. [11792845] (JBS) [Entered: 08/18/2020 09:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.