Christopher Lull, et al v. County of Sacramento, et al
| CYNDI LEE, JUNE POWELLS-MAYS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO REVENUE RECOVERY DEPARTMENT, WAYNE EASTMAN, JARED WICKLIFF, RUSS WILLIAMS, FLORENCE EVANS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY COUNSEL DEPARTMENT, BOB IVIE, TAMMY DERBY, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CLERK OF THE BOARD, LORI MOSS, PAUL MUNOZ, SCOTT PURVIS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, LEIGHANN MOFFITT, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, ROBIN RASMUSSEN, BRIAN WASHKO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JOHN MUZINICH, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO BUILDING DEPARTMENT and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT |
| AUTOTEK, INC. and CHRISTOPHER LULL |
| 20-16599 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CHRISTOPHER LULL V. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellee County of Sacramento, 10/19/2020, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11857094] (CL) [Entered: 10/13/2020 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/21/2020, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11813962] (CL) [Entered: 09/04/2020 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/27/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11804931]. [20-16599] (AD) [Entered: 08/27/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Autotek, Inc. and Christopher Lull Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/27/2020. [11804685] [20-16599] (Vaughan, Cris) [Entered: 08/27/2020 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellants shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11804174] (TSP) [Entered: 08/26/2020 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Autotek, Inc. and Christopher Lull Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/27/2020. Transcript ordered by 09/17/2020. Transcript due 10/19/2020. Appellants Autotek, Inc. and Christopher Lull opening brief due 11/27/2020. Appellees County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, County of Sacramento Building Department, County of Sacramento Clerk of the Board, County of Sacramento Community Development Department, County of Sacramento County Counsel Department, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Revenue Recovery Department, County of Sacramento Sheriff's Department, Tammy Derby, Wayne Eastman, Florence Evans, Bob Ivie, Cyndi Lee, Leighann Moffitt, Lori Moss, Paul Munoz, John Muzinich, June Powells-Mays, Scott Purvis, Robin Rasmussen, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Brian Washko, Jared Wickliff and Russ Williams answering brief due 12/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11795978] (RT) [Entered: 08/20/2020 08:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
