Nicholas Trammell v. City of San Francisco
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS KENNETH TRAMMELL
Case Number: 20-16611
Filed: August 21, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Filing 19 Streamlined request by Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the Clerk Order filed 09/29/2020. Docket [12]. [11862366] (DLM) [Entered: 10/16/2020 04:03 PM]
October 15, 2020 Filing 18 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell response to 9/29/20. Served on 10/09/2020. [11860554] (CW) [Entered: 10/15/2020 03:35 PM]
October 13, 2020 Filing 17 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/06/2020. [11857550] (CW) [Entered: 10/14/2020 07:41 AM]
October 2, 2020 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell letter dated 09/28/2020 re: "sign in out of state charges". Paper filing deficiency: None. [11846531] (CW) [Entered: 10/03/2020 05:45 PM]
October 2, 2020 Filing 15 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion for rehearing en banc only. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/26/2020. [11846530] (CW) [Entered: 10/03/2020 05:43 PM]
October 2, 2020 Filing 14 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell reply to opposition of pending motions . Served on 09/28/2020. [11846529] (CW) [Entered: 10/03/2020 05:41 PM]
October 2, 2020 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/28/2020. [11846528] (CW) [Entered: 10/03/2020 05:38 PM]
September 29, 2020 Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on September 14, 2020, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. All pending motions will be addressed, if necessary, after the court resolves this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11841474] (AF) [Entered: 09/29/2020 04:40 PM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion for extensions of time. Briefing is stayed. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/01/2020. [11828594] (CW) [Entered: 09/18/2020 07:10 AM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 10 Streamlined request by Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the motions to proceed In Forma Pauperis and to appoint pro bono counsel. Dockets [4,7]. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11828343] (DLM) [Entered: 09/17/2020 04:49 PM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 9 Received notice of change of address dated 09/02/2020 from Nicholas Kenneth Trammell. New address: 14901 South Central Ave. Chino, CA 91708. [11823775]--[Edited: address updated. 09/15/2020 by SLM] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 07:23 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell letter dated 09/01/2020 re: addendum to mtn to appt csl. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11823744] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:57 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/01/2020. [11823743] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:56 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell letter dated 09/14/2020 re: response to 8/21/20 case opening entry, statements regarding appt of csl, request for damages. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11823741] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:55 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell letter dated 09/02/2020 re: statements in support of ifp motion. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11823739] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:51 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/02/2020. [11823738] (CW) [Entered: 09/15/2020 06:49 AM]
September 14, 2020 Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 09/02/2020. Major deficiency: fees are due. [11823079] (KWG) [Entered: 09/14/2020 03:02 PM]
August 24, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11799104] (CKP) [Entered: 08/23/2020 12:24 PM]
August 21, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nicholas Kenneth Trammell opening brief due 10/23/2020. [11797720] (RT) [Entered: 08/21/2020 10:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nicholas Trammell v. City of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NICHOLAS KENNETH TRAMMELL
Represented By: Nicholas Kenneth Trammell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?