Kenton Keading v. City of Pinole, et al
| NEIL H. GANG and CITY OF PINOLE |
| KENTON KEADING |
| 20-16665 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kenton Keading motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11831031] (NAC) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11807027] (CKP) [Entered: 08/30/2020 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Philip John Downs Jr. in 20-16665 substituted by Attorney Dale Long Allen Jr. in 20-16665 [11805420] (QDL) [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Dale L. Allen, Jr. (Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth, 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellees City of Pinole and Neil H. Gang. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Philip John Downs, Jr., Esquire for Appellees City of Pinole and Neil H. Gang. Date of service: 08/27/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11805381] [20-16665] (Allen, Dale) [Entered: 08/27/2020 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11804844] (CKP) [Entered: 08/27/2020 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenton Keading opening brief due 10/26/2020. Appellees City of Pinole and Neil H. Gang answering brief due 11/25/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11804616] (JBS) [Entered: 08/27/2020 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
