Larry Dunlap v. Douglas Ducey, et al
LARRY DONNELL DUNLAP |
SANDRA R. LINES, Board Member of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency, DOUGLAS A. DUCEY, Governor, ELLEN KIRSCHBAUM, Board Member of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency and C. T. WRIGHT, Board Member of the Arizona Board of Executive Clemency |
20-16683 |
August 31, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Courts October 16, 2020, order denying appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ] ). The October 16, 2020, order provides, however, that [n]o motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. Accordingly, appellants motion for reconsideration will not be entertained. Appellants motion seeking to have the Clerk provide him with a copy of an application to proceed in forma pauperis before the United States Supreme Court (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ] ) is denied. Appellants request is properly directed to the Supreme Court. [11870332] (JPD) [Entered: 10/23/2020 02:48 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Larry Donnell Dunlap motion for clerk of court to provide plaintiff with a copy of the United States Supreme Court information. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/21/2020. [11869029] (QDL) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:46 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Larry Donnell Dunlap motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 10/16/2020 (document entitled "notice of appeal"). Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/21/2020. [11869023] (QDL) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:44 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE) Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is denied because appellant has had three or more prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and appellant has not alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Failure to pay the fees will result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained.If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [11861693] (JPD) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:14 PM] |
Filing 4 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Larry Donnell Dunlap opening brief of 13 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 09/22/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (IFP motion pending). [11833415] (SML) [Entered: 09/22/2020 04:30 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Larry Donnell Dunlap motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/14/2020. [11822338] (QDL) [Entered: 09/14/2020 10:55 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11809547] (CKP) [Entered: 09/01/2020 01:27 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Larry Donnell Dunlap opening brief due 10/26/2020. [11808327] (JMR) [Entered: 08/31/2020 03:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.