Ignacio Tirado Gonzalez v. Attorney General for the State, et al
| IGNACIO RANTON TIRADO GONZALEZ |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director, ADOC |
| 20-16726 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KWH): To the extent that appellant seeks to challenge the district courts denial of appellants motion for appointment of counsel, a review of the record suggests this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; 1292; see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983) (We hold that an interlocutory order denying a motion for appointment of counsel in a habeas proceeding . . . is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291.). Further, to the extent that appellant challenges the district courts denial of appellants request to proceed in forma pauperis, a review of the record suggests that this appeal may be appropriate for summary disposition because the district court denied the request as moot after appellant paid the $5 filing fee. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). Within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall show cause why the court should not (1) dismiss this appeal as to the denial of his counsel motion, and (2) summarily affirm the district courts denial of his application to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, this appeal will be automatically dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. [11879668] (OC) [Entered: 11/02/2020 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ignacio Ranton Tirado Gonzalez motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 9/24/2020. [11841650] (RR) [Entered: 09/29/2020 07:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11821066] (CKP) [Entered: 09/11/2020 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11815388] (JMR) [Entered: 09/08/2020 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
