Patricia Meadow v. Goodrich Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee: PATRICIA MEADOW
Defendant / Appellant: GOODRICH CORPORATION
Case Number: 20-16753
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 13, 2021 PATRICIA MEADOW V. GOODRICH CORPORATION

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2020 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 11/10/2020, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11858947] (VS) [Entered: 10/14/2020 03:57 PM]
September 25, 2020 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 10/09/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11837548] (VS) [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:26 PM]
September 23, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Goodrich Corporation Correspondence: Certificate of No Transcript and Statement of Issues on Appeal. Date of service: 09/23/2020 [11835114] [20-16753] (Corum, William) [Entered: 09/23/2020 09:01 PM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/17/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11828492]. [20-16753] (AD) [Entered: 09/17/2020 06:44 PM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Goodrich Corporation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/17/2020. [11827718] [20-16753] (Corum, William) [Entered: 09/17/2020 12:44 PM]
September 10, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Goodrich Corporation Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/17/2020. Transcript ordered by 10/09/2020. Transcript due 11/09/2020. Appellant Goodrich Corporation opening brief due 12/18/2020. Appellee Patricia Meadow answering brief due 01/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11818908] (JBS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 11:26 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Patricia Meadow v. Goodrich Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: PATRICIA MEADOW
Represented By: Timothy G. Tonkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: GOODRICH CORPORATION
Represented By: Dan W. Goldfine
Represented By: William E. Corum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?