Leigh Law Group, P.C. v. Michael Wilson, et al
Defendant: MICHELLE LYNN MCCORMACK
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C.
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Case Number: 20-16782
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2020 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson motion for reconsideration of dispositive Judge Order of 10/15/2020. Date of service: 10/15/2020. [11860979] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 10/15/2020 06:04 PM]
October 15, 2020 Filing 12 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987) (order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11860352] (JPD) [Entered: 10/15/2020 02:41 PM]
October 15, 2020 Filing 11 Streamlined request [10] by Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11859711] (JN) [Entered: 10/15/2020 10:35 AM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson. New requested due date is 12/18/2020. [11859192] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 10/14/2020 05:41 PM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 9 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-16782: IFP Pending In COA] ). [11857902] (QDL) [Entered: 10/14/2020 10:10 AM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 10/14/2020. [11857681] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 10/14/2020 08:55 AM]
September 28, 2020 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): Appellants motion to consolidate (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied. The briefing schedule established on September 16, 2020 remains in effect for this appeal No. 20-16782. [11839522] (JPD) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:47 PM]
September 18, 2020 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson Correspondence: WILSONS NOTICE RE THIS COURTS SUPERVISORY MANDAMUS JURISDICTION IN 20-16467, 20-16470, 20-16521, 20-16523, 20-16525, 20-16531, 20-16536, 20-16537, 20-16630, 20-16674, 20-16738, and 20-16782. Date of service: 09/18/2020 [11829236] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 09/18/2020 12:43 PM]
September 18, 2020 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/17/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11828581]. [20-16782] (AD) [Entered: 09/18/2020 06:44 AM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/17/2020. [11828503] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 09/17/2020 06:46 PM]
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson Correspondence: WILSONS 9/17/2020 CERTIFICATE THAT NO TRANSCRIPT WILL BE ORDERED. Date of service: 09/17/2020 [11828502] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 09/17/2020 06:45 PM]
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Geary Wilson Amended Motion to consolidate cases 20-16467, 20-16470, 20-16521, 20-16523, 20-16525, 20-16531, 20-16536, 20-16537, 20-16630, 20-16674, 20-16738, 20-16782. Date of service: 09/16/2020. [11826454] [20-16782] (Wilson, Michael) [Entered: 09/16/2020 01:59 PM]
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Geary Wilson opening brief due 11/18/2020. Appellee Leigh Law Group, P.C. answering brief due 12/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11825674] (RT) [Entered: 09/16/2020 09:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Leigh Law Group, P.C. v. Michael Wilson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHELLE LYNN MCCORMACK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C.
Represented By: Damien Troutman Esquire
Represented By: Mandy Gina Leigh Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Represented By: Michael Geary Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?