Susana Verduzco v. United States Attorneys Office, et al
| UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, named as Office of Attorney General (OAG), UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE |
| SUSANA E. VERDUZCO |
| 20-16798 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Susana E. Verduzco motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11872458] (NAC) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Susana E. Verduzco statement that appeal should go forward. [11872456] (NAC) [Entered: 10/26/2020 08:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court revoked appellants leave to proceed in forma pauperis for this appeal because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11836124] (CKP) [Entered: 09/24/2020 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-16798: Due] ). [11834342] (CO) [Entered: 09/23/2020 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/22/2020. Plaintiff's appeal (20-16798) is frivolous and her in forma pauperis status therefore is revoked and will not continue on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a) (3) [11834275] (NAC) [Entered: 09/23/2020 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11829446] (CKP) [Entered: 09/18/2020 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Susana E. Verduzco opening brief due 11/16/2020. Appellees United States Attorney General, United States Attorney's Office and United States Department of Justice answering brief due 12/16/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11827515] (JBS) [Entered: 09/17/2020 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
