Alfred Caraffa v. Vasquez, et al
| MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, named as MCSO, M. LAKE, Deputy, STATE OF ARIZONA and VASQUEZ |
| ALFRED E. CARAFFA |
| 20-16822 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet in response to his letter of request received on 10/14/2020. [11861182] (JR) [Entered: 10/16/2020 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11861047] (RR) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa noticerequesting docket sheet. [11861046] (RR) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11861045] (RR) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief of 8 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/03/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (IFP motion and motion to appoint counsel are pending). [11858555] (LA) [Entered: 10/14/2020 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11833317] (CKP) [Entered: 09/22/2020 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEESL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief due 11/16/2020. . [11830398] (JPD) [Entered: 09/21/2020 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
