Jesus Loreto, Jr. v. Bisbee Police Department, et al
| MATT ECKLUND, JOE LONG, COCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CCSO, (Eric Encinas) CCSO Officer, CITY OF DOUGLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, named as D.E.A (Drug Enforcement Agency) (Cullen G Conerly) Affiant Special Agent, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOMBSTONE MARSHALS OFFICE, TOM SCOTT HARTZELL, Legal Defense Attorney, SIERRA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, GARDNER, Sgt., UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, USBP, various agents, male/female, PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, named as Pima County Sheriffs Office, PCSO (Naipier), DPS, (Richardson) State Trooper, named as Department of Safety, CARLOS MORENO and BISBEE POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| JESUS ERNESTO LORETO, Jr. |
| 20-16838 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11867018] (CKP) [Entered: 10/21/2020 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/08/2020. [11865089] (JFF) [Entered: 10/20/2020 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jesus Ernesto Loreto, Jr. motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/03/2020. [11852664] (JFF) [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11837278] (CKP) [Entered: 09/25/2020 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-16838: Due] ). [11836958] (CO) [Entered: 09/25/2020 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jesus Ernesto Loreto Jr. opening brief due 11/20/2020. [11833254] (JBS) [Entered: 09/22/2020 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
