Eric Dale v. Brian Williams, et al
Petitioner: ERIC L. DALE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and BRIAN E. WILLIAMS
Case Number: 20-16839
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2020 Filing 3 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: TSP) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 09/24/2020), This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11864270] (TSP) [Entered: 10/19/2020 03:42 PM]
September 24, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the August 20, 2020 order does not appear final or appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291. Appellants cite 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) in the notice of appeal, but appellants did not file a timely petition for permission to appeal the August 20, 2020 order in this court. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) (a party must seek permission to appeal in this court within ten days after the entry of the order being challenged); In re Benny, 812 F.2d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1987) (The timely filing of a petition for leave to appeal following district court certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) is jurisdictional.). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11835541] (WL) [Entered: 09/24/2020 11:19 AM]
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Brian E. Williams opening brief due 11/25/2020. Appellee Eric L. Dale answering brief due 12/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11833251]--[Edited: attached correct case opening packet. 09/22/2020 by SLM] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2020 03:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eric Dale v. Brian Williams, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Represented By: Adam Solinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRIAN E. WILLIAMS
Represented By: Adam Solinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ERIC L. DALE
Represented By: Kimberly Sandberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?