Arnold Leong v. Warren Havens
| WARREN C. HAVENS |
| SUSAN L. UECKER |
| ARNOLD LEONG |
| 20-16844 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Warren C. Havens motion for reconsideration of dispositive Judge Order of 10/19/2020. Date of service: 10/21/2020. [11867939] [20-16844] (Havens, Warren) [Entered: 10/21/2020 10:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) Appellants September 21, 2020 notice of appeal challenges the district courts September 18, 2020 order denying appellants motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal for appeal No. 20-16787. We dismiss this appeal because the denial of in forma pauperis status for purposes of appeal must be challenged in an appeal from a final order or judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1), (5) (following district courts denial of motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on appeal, appellant may file motion to proceed in forma pauperis in court of appeals); see also Advisory Committee Note to Rule 24 (Rule 24 establishes a subsequent motion in the court of appeals, rather than an appeal from the order of denial or from the certification or lack of good faith, as the proper procedure to challenge district court order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal). DISMISSED. [11863723] (OC) [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Warren C. Havens opening brief due 11/25/2020. Appellees Arnold Leong and Susan L. Uecker answering brief due 12/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11833939] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2020 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
