Michael Alexander v. County of San Mateo, et al
| SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER, SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH COMMISSION, ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY PROFESSIONALS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, GEORGE PON, BILL GRAHAM, DANIEL REYNOLDS, Lt., CAROLE GROOM, THE HEALTH PLAN OF SAN MATEO, KENNETH TAI, DALY CITY CLINIC, DAVID CANEPA, DAVE PINE, LIGIA ANDRADE ZUNIGA, DON HORSLEY, BARBARA MIAO, SI FRANCE, C. J. KUNNAPPILLY, CEO of San Mateo Medical Center, WARREN SLOCUM, JEANETTE AVILES, STEVE NEEDLES, TERESA GUINGONA FERRER, CARLOS G. BOLANOS and SAN MATEO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS |
| MICHAEL ALEXANDER |
| 20-16861 |
| September 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (WAF, MSB and JSB) [11887782] (RL) [Entered: 11/10/2020 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal filed on September 16, 2020 does not challenge any final or appealable order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants notice of appeal contains an alternative request for relief by way of a petition for writ of mandamus. The petition is denied because appellant has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). All pending motions are denied as moot. To date, appellant has not filed a new notice of appeal from the district courts final order entered on October 6, 2020. DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. [11863854] (OC) [Entered: 10/19/2020 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/06/2020. [11852830] (RL) [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed representation notice of appellant Michael Alexander. No service date. [11851532] (RL) [Entered: 10/07/2020 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of motion filed in United States District Court for the Northern District of California San Francisco Division re: Motion for reconsideration of ex parte request for TRO & preliminary injunction dated July 29, 2020; declaration & memorandum. Motion filed by Appellant Michael Alexander. [11851531] (RL) [Entered: 10/07/2020 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander letter re: Statements regarding case; Copy of US District Court for the Northern District of California San Francisco Division: Motion for appointment of counsel. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11851521] (RL) [Entered: 10/07/2020 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander URGENT motion under FRAP Circuit Rule 27-3(b) for preliminary injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/07/2020. [11851512] (RL) [Entered: 10/07/2020 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Alexander opening brief due 11/25/2020. Appellees Allied Universal Security Professionals, Ligia Andrade Zuniga, Jeanette Aviles, Carlos G. Bolanos, David Canepa, County of San Mateo, Daly City Clinic, Si France, Bill Graham, Carole Groom, Teresa Guingona Ferrer, Don Horsley, C. J. Kunnappilly, Barbara Miao, Steve Needles, Dave Pine, George Pon, Daniel Reynolds, San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, San Mateo County Health Commission, San Mateo Medical Center, Warren Slocum, Kenneth Tai and The Health Plan of San Mateo answering brief due 12/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11835404] (RT) [Entered: 09/24/2020 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
