Ismael Murphy-Richardson v. State of Arizona, et al
| MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, STATE OF ARIZONA, MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA, named as Acting Attorney General for the State of Arizona and COUNTY OF FLORENCE |
| ISMAEL ANTONIO MURPHY-RICHARDSON |
| 20-16956 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, SANDRA S. IKUTA and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 30, 2020 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11899706] (OC) [Entered: 11/19/2020 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11851873] (JMR) [Entered: 10/08/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
