Eugene Coins, Jr. v. Frye, et al
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, [10] First Amended Complaint and FRYE, [10] First Amended Complaint |
EUGENE COINS, Jr. |
20-16965 |
October 8, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Received notice of change of address from Eugene Coins, Jr.. New address: WSCC, PO Box 7007, Carson City, NV 89702. [11892921]--[Edited: address updated. 11/13/2020 by SLM] (RL) [Entered: 11/13/2020 04:06 PM] |
Filing 15 Filed Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11877085] (NAC) [Entered: 10/30/2020 11:37 AM] |
Filing 14 Filed Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 10/20/2020. [11875764] (RL) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:23 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. FORM 4 addendum to motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 10/22/2020. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11875759] (RL) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:22 PM] |
Filing 12 Received notice of change of address dated 10/14/2020 from Eugene Coins, Jr.. New address: #87350, 85 W Lake Mead Pkwy., Henderson, NV 89015. [11869774]--[Edited: address updated. 10/23/2020 by SLM] (RL) [Entered: 10/23/2020 10:53 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/14/2020. [11869761] (RL) [Entered: 10/23/2020 10:49 AM] |
Filing 10 Filed Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/14/2020. [11869747] (RL) [Entered: 10/23/2020 10:45 AM] |
Filing 9 Streamlined request by Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed see court order dated 10/20/2020. [11869031] (BG) [Entered: 10/22/2020 03:47 PM] |
Filing 8 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Eugene Coins, Jr. opening brief of 4 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/22/2020. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: no certificate of service on appellee's counsel, briefing is stayed. [11868642] (KWG) [Entered: 10/22/2020 01:14 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11865612] (CKP) [Entered: 10/20/2020 01:32 PM] |
Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 10/19/2020 revoking plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on appeal. [11864517] (QDL) [Entered: 10/19/2020 04:48 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11861906] (CKP) [Entered: 10/16/2020 01:54 PM] |
Filing 4 Attorney Peter E. Dunkley substituted by Attorney Frank Anthony Toddre II. [11854335] (RL) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:02 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Frank A. Toddre (Nevada State Attorney General's Office, 555 E. Washington Ave., Suite 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellee Frye. Substitution for Attorney Peter E. Dunkley for Appellee Frye. Date of service: 10/09/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11854198] [20-16965] (Toddre, Frank) [Entered: 10/09/2020 01:13 PM] |
Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eugene Coins Jr. opening brief due 12/07/2020. Appellee Frye answering brief due 01/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11852687] (JPD) [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Terminated Peter E. Dunkley for Isidro Baca in 20-16965, counsel added to party in error. [11852680] (JPD) [Entered: 10/08/2020 02:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.