Mi Familia Vota, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Plaintiff / Appellee: ARIZONA COALITION FOR CHANGE, MI FAMILIA VOTA and ULISES VENTURA
Defendant / Appellant: KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State
Amicus Curiae: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER
Case Number: 20-17000
Filed: October 13, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2020 Filing 4 Entered appearance of Amicus Curiae - Pending League of Women Voters of Arizona. [11859557] (RR) [Entered: 10/15/2020 09:44 AM]
October 14, 2020 Filing 3 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 11861830-2 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) League of Women Voters of Arizona and Phoenix Indian Center Motion to become amicus curiae. Date of service: 10/14/2020. [11858980] [20-16932, 20-17000] (Elias, Jordan) [Entered: 10/14/2020 04:10 PM]
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Filed Order for PUBLICATION (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) (Partial dissent by Judge Bybee) We thus grant the Secretary of States specific request for a prospective stay, with a two-day grace period. So ORDERED. [11857294]--[Edited (Corrected to add in 20-17000)10/13/2020 by AKM]--[COURT UPDATE: Spread docket text to 20-17000. 10/14/2020 by SLM] (AKM) [Entered: 10/13/2020 06:13 PM]
October 13, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Katie Hobbs Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/20/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/12/2020. Transcript due 12/11/2020. Appellant Katie Hobbs opening brief due 01/20/2021. Appellees Arizona Coalition for Change, Mi Familia Vota and Ulises Ventura answering brief due 02/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11855792] (JBS) [Entered: 10/13/2020 10:08 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mi Familia Vota, et al v. Katie Hobbs, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellant: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: ARIZONA COALITION FOR CHANGE
Represented By: John C. Bonifaz
Represented By: Mary O'Grady
Represented By: Gillian Robin Cassell-Stiga Esquire
Represented By: Ronald A. Fein
Represented By: Joshua Bendor
Represented By: Nicholas Bourland
Represented By: Zoe Salzman
Represented By: Ben Clements
Represented By: Matthew D. Brinckerhoff
Represented By: Jonathan S. Abady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: MI FAMILIA VOTA
Represented By: John C. Bonifaz
Represented By: Mary O'Grady
Represented By: Gillian Robin Cassell-Stiga Esquire
Represented By: Ronald A. Fein
Represented By: Joshua Bendor
Represented By: Nicholas Bourland
Represented By: Zoe Salzman
Represented By: Ben Clements
Represented By: Matthew D. Brinckerhoff
Represented By: Jonathan S. Abady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: ULISES VENTURA
Represented By: John C. Bonifaz
Represented By: Mary O'Grady
Represented By: Gillian Robin Cassell-Stiga Esquire
Represented By: Ronald A. Fein
Represented By: Joshua Bendor
Represented By: Nicholas Bourland
Represented By: Zoe Salzman
Represented By: Ben Clements
Represented By: Matthew D. Brinckerhoff
Represented By: Jonathan S. Abady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State
Represented By: Kristen Michelle Yost
Represented By: David Andrew Gaona Esquire
Represented By: Roopali H. Desai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?