Joseph Marsala v. Ralph Diaz, et al
| RALPH DIAZ, Secretary and LIZZARAGA, Warden |
| P. EATON, Special Appearance |
| JOSEPH AUGUST MARSALA |
| 20-17006 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed original and 4 copies of Appellant Joseph August Marsala opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/20/2020. [11924767] (LA) [Entered: 12/11/2020 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney R. Lawrence Bragg in 20-17006 substituted by Attorney Oliver Wu in 20-17006 [11901289] (CW) [Entered: 11/20/2020 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Oliver C. Wu (California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102) for Appellee P. Eaton. Substitution for Attorney R. Lawrence Bragg, Esquire for Appellee P. Eaton. Date of service: 11/20/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11901016] [20-17006] (Wu, Oliver) [Entered: 11/20/2020 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Joseph August Marsala letter dated 10/10/2020 re: addendum to appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11876547] (CW) [Entered: 10/29/2020 05:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph August Marsala opening brief due 12/08/2020. Appellee P. Eaton answering brief due 01/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11856690] (WL) [Entered: 10/13/2020 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
