Shawn Jensen, et al v. David Shinn, et al
DUSTIN BRISLAN and VICTOR ANTONIO PARSONS |
JEREMY SMITH, JOSEPH HEFNER, JOSHUA POLSON, CHARLOTTE WELLS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, JACKIE THOMAS, STEPHEN SWARTZ, CHRISTINA VERDUZCO, SHAWN JENSEN, DESIREE LICCI, SONIA RODRIGUEZ, MARYANNE CHISHOLM, ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW and ROBERT CARRASCO GAMEZ, Jr. |
RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections, in their official capacities and DAVID SHINN, Director |
20-17021 |
October 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (RGA): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [11887189] (WL) [Entered: 11/09/2020 04:11 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. By November 5, 2020, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform Roxane Ashe, Circuit Mediator, by email at roxane_ashe@ca9.uscourts.gov, of their clients views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case number in the subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, from the other parties in the case. This communication shall not be filed with the court. For more detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [11868673] (WL) [Entered: 10/22/2020 01:28 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/21/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11867891]. [20-17021] (AD) [Entered: 10/21/2020 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Richard Pratt and David Shinn Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/21/2020. [11867814] [20-17021] (Acedo, Nicholas) [Entered: 10/21/2020 05:17 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Richard Pratt and David Shinn, Director Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/21/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/12/2020. Transcript due 12/10/2020. Appellants Richard Pratt and David Shinn, Director opening brief due 01/20/2021. Appellees Arizona Center For Disability Law, Maryanne Chisholm, Robert Carrasco Gamez Jr., Joseph Hefner, Shawn Jensen, Desiree Licci, Joshua Polson, Sonia Rodriguez, Jeremy Smith, Stephen Swartz, Jackie Thomas, Christina Verduzco and Charlotte Wells answering brief due 02/22/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11858663] (RT) [Entered: 10/14/2020 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.