Shaykh Muhammad Al Saud v. Jason Medley, et al
| MIGUEL RETANA, State Prison Guard AZ, DUPNICK, named as Sheriff Dupnick, KREAMER, JONATHAN P. SIRESS, FAY IBARA, named as Deputy Warden Fay Ibara Arizona, CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Southern Director, PYLE, State Prison Guard Arizona, JASON MEDLEY and DAVID CORONADO |
| SHAYKH MUHAMMAD ABDUL BIN TALAL AL SAUD, AKA Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud |
| 20-17052 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SHAYKH MUHAMMAD AL SAUD V. JASON MEDLEY, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11875927] (CKP) [Entered: 10/29/2020 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 10/25/2020. [Case Number 20-17052: Partially Paid] [11875713] (RL) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11864099] (CKP) [Entered: 10/19/2020 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Bin Talal Al Saud opening brief due 12/14/2020. Appellees Jason Medley, et al. answering brief due 01/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11861525] (JPD) [Entered: 10/16/2020 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
