Colin Scholl, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG, in his official capacity as U.S. Commissioner of Internal Revenue and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Intervenor Plaintiff: JOHN GALVAN and PATRICK TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee: COLIN SCHOLL and LISA STRAWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Case Number: 20-17077
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2020 Filing 15 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LBS) Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 14 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11924657] (JMR) [Entered: 12/11/2020 02:35 PM]
December 9, 2020 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellants IRS, Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury and USA Unopposed Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 12/09/2020. [11920327] [20-17077] (Avetta, Julie) [Entered: 12/09/2020 12:05 PM]
October 27, 2020 Filing 13 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/27/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11873706]. [20-17077] (AD) [Entered: 10/27/2020 06:44 PM]
October 27, 2020 Filing 12 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/27/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11873704]. [20-17077] (AD) [Entered: 10/27/2020 06:44 PM]
October 27, 2020 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants USA, United States Department of the Treasury, IRS, Steven Terner Mnuchin and Charles P. Rettig Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/27/2020. [11873367] [20-17077] (Avetta, Julie) [Entered: 10/27/2020 03:08 PM]
October 27, 2020 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellees Colin Scholl and Lisa Strawn Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/27/2020. [11873188] [20-17077] (Dermody, Kelly) [Entered: 10/27/2020 01:49 PM]
October 23, 2020 Filing 9 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) The emergency motion for a stay pending appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 426 (2009) In the emergency motion, appellants do not argue that their policy precluding incarcerated persons from receiving advance payments under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), Pub. L. 116136, is valid under the statute.. They raise only procedural arguments: that appellees claims are barred by 26 U.S.C. 7422(a), and that appellees have no cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 702 (the APA). We conclude that appellants have not demonstrated a sufficient likelihood of success on appeal to warrant a stay. Appellants have not demonstrated that the district court erred in concluding that appellees claims fall outside 7422(a). We note that appellants policy of considering incarcerated individuals ineligible for CARES Act advance payments precluded class members from following the prescribed claims filing procedures used by other individuals. Appellants also have not demonstrated that the district court erred in concluding that appellees could proceed under the APA. Appellees challenge an agency policy, leaving determination of whether any individual incarcerated individual is to receive advance CARES Act payments to the agencys decision, applying the generally applicable standards and procedures. DENIED. [11870735] (WL) [Entered: 10/23/2020 05:12 PM]
October 23, 2020 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Steven Terner Mnuchin, IRS, Charles P. Rettig, USA and United States Department of the Treasury reply to response (). Date of service: 10/23/2020. [11869421] [20-17077] (Avetta, Julie) [Entered: 10/23/2020 08:08 AM]
October 22, 2020 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Colin Scholl and Lisa Strawn response opposing motion ([ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 5 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 10/22/2020. [11868453] [20-17077] (Dermody, Kelly) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:45 AM]
October 21, 2020 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay pending appeal. The response to the motion is due by 12:00 pm Pacific Time on Thursday, October 22, 2020. The optional reply in support of the motion is due by 8:00 am Pacific Time on Friday, October 23, 2020. [11866812] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2020 11:05 AM]
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants IRS, Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury and USA EMERGENCY Motion for injunction pending appeal. Date of service: 10/20/2020. [11866327] [20-17077] (Ugolini, Francesca) [Entered: 10/20/2020 07:42 PM]
October 20, 2020 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Francesca Ugolini, Michael J. Haungs for party(s) Appellant USA, Appellant Charles P. Rettig, Appellant Steven Terner Mnuchin, Appellant United States Department of the Treasury and Appellant IRS, in case 20-17077. [11865787] (QDL) [Entered: 10/20/2020 02:27 PM]
October 20, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael J Haungs (Tax Division Department of Justice Post Office Box 502 Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellants IRS, Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury and USA. Date of service: 10/20/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11865774] [20-17077] (Haungs, Michael) [Entered: 10/20/2020 02:24 PM]
October 20, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Francesca Ugolini (Department of Justice, Tax Division, P.O. Box 502, Washington DC 20044) for Appellants IRS, Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury and USA. Date of service: 10/20/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11865755] [20-17077] (Ugolini, Francesca) [Entered: 10/20/2020 02:17 PM]
October 20, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury, United States Internal Revenue Service and United States of America Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/27/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/19/2020. Transcript due 12/21/2020. Appellants Steven Terner Mnuchin, Charles P. Rettig, United States Department of the Treasury, United States Internal Revenue Service and United States of America opening brief due 01/28/2021. Appellees John Galvan, Colin Scholl, Lisa Strawn and Patrick Taylor answering brief due 03/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11865547] (JBS) [Entered: 10/20/2020 01:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Colin Scholl, et al v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Represented By: Julie Ciamporcero Avetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Represented By: Julie Ciamporcero Avetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Represented By: Julie Ciamporcero Avetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHARLES P. RETTIG, in his official capacity as U.S. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Represented By: Julie Ciamporcero Avetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Represented By: Julie Ciamporcero Avetta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor plaintiff: JOHN GALVAN
Represented By: Christopher R. Pitoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor plaintiff: PATRICK TAYLOR
Represented By: Christopher R. Pitoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: COLIN SCHOLL
Represented By: Yaman Salahi
Represented By: Eva Jefferson Paterson
Represented By: Kelly M. Dermody
Represented By: Jalle Dafa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LISA STRAWN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Yaman Salahi
Represented By: Eva Jefferson Paterson
Represented By: Kelly M. Dermody
Represented By: Jalle Dafa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?