Emilio Jean v. Attorney General for the State, et al
Respondent: CHARLES L. RYAN
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant: EMILIO JEAN
Case Number: 20-17092
Filed: October 21, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2020 Filing 5 Attorneys Terry Michael Crist III and Terry Michael Crist III in 20-17092 substituted by Attorneys Jim Nielsen and Jim Nielsen in 20-17092 [11930772] (NAC) [Entered: 12/17/2020 08:04 AM]
December 17, 2020 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of J.D, Nielsen (Arizona Attorney General Office, 2005 N. Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004) for Appellees Attorney General for the State of Arizona and David Shinn. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Terry Michael Crist, III for Appellees Attorney General for the State of Arizona and David Shinn. Date of service: 12/17/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11930763] [20-17092] (Nielsen, Jim) [Entered: 12/17/2020 07:49 AM]
December 11, 2020 Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (RRC, SSI and KKL) [11923789] (NAC) [Entered: 12/11/2020 08:00 AM]
November 19, 2020 Filing 2 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, SANDRA S. IKUTA and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [11900112] (WL) [Entered: 11/19/2020 04:31 PM]
October 21, 2020 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11867537] (JMR) [Entered: 10/21/2020 03:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Emilio Jean v. Attorney General for the State, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHARLES L. RYAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Terry Michael Crist III
Represented By: Jim Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
Represented By: Terry Michael Crist III
Represented By: Jim Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: EMILIO JEAN
Represented By: Emilio Jean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?