Jack Kimm v. Martin Brannan, et al
Defendant / Appellee: RAYBURN EVANS, COUNTY OF LA PAZ, a municipal entity, THOMAS JONES, MARTIN BRANNAN, FRANK HAWS and SAMUEL VERDERMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant: JACK KIMM
Case Number: 20-17135
Filed: October 29, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2020 Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SSR) The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) of Joy Bertrand to withdraw as counsel for appellant is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that that Joy Bertrand is no longer counsel of record for appellant. The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall, within 21 days after the date of this order, act as the mandate of this court. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on former counsel Joy Bertrand and on appellant at 3293 E. Cross Ave., Tulare, CA 93274. [11914927] (WL) [Entered: 12/04/2020 10:01 AM]
November 16, 2020 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jack Kimm Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 11/16/2020. [11894414] [20-17135] (Bertrand, Joy) [Entered: 11/16/2020 02:38 PM]
November 11, 2020 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jack Kimm Corrected motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Ms. Joy Bertrand for Appellant Jack Kimm motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 11/11/2020. [11889254] [20-17135] (Bertrand, Joy) [Entered: 11/11/2020 10:10 AM]
November 10, 2020 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) of Joy Bertrand to withdraw as counsel for appellant is denied without prejudice to a renewed motion that provides appellants address. The opening brief remains due February 5, 2021. The answering brief is due March 8, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11889055] (WL) [Entered: 11/10/2020 05:01 PM]
November 10, 2020 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [11888553] (LW) [Entered: 11/10/2020 01:54 PM]
November 6, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jack Kimm motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Ms. Joy Bertrand for Appellant Jack Kimm motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 11/06/2020. [11884787] [20-17135] (Bertrand, Joy) [Entered: 11/06/2020 01:48 PM]
October 29, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jack Kimm Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/05/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/27/2020. Transcript due 12/28/2020. Appellant Jack Kimm opening brief due 02/05/2021. Appellees Martin Brannan, County of La Paz, Rayburn Evans, Frank Haws, Thomas Jones and Samuel Verderman answering brief due 03/08/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11876039] (RT) [Entered: 10/29/2020 02:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jack Kimm v. Martin Brannan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RAYBURN EVANS
Represented By: Mark N. Mazda Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF LA PAZ, a municipal entity
Represented By: Michael Warzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS JONES
Represented By: Michael Warzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARTIN BRANNAN
Represented By: Michael Warzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRANK HAWS
Represented By: Michael Warzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMUEL VERDERMAN
Represented By: Michael Warzynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JACK KIMM
Represented By: Joy Bertrand
Represented By: Jack Kimm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?