Sammy Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriff's De, et al
| SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SACRAMENTO MAIN JAIL, CROTEAU, Sergeant #143 and MORGAN, Deputy, #847 |
| SAMMY DAVIS MORGAN |
| 20-17180 |
| November 4, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (RRC, SSI and KKL) [11924029] (QDL) [Entered: 12/11/2020 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Sammy Davis Morgan motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 11/20/2020. [11909192] (QDL) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Sammy Davis Morgan motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 11/20/2020. [11909189] (QDL) [Entered: 11/30/2020 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, SANDRA S. IKUTA and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11899821] (JMR) [Entered: 11/19/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Sammy Davis Morgan opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: No). Served on 11/11/2020. Major deficiency: fees are due. Notified Appellant. [11895900] (KWG) [Entered: 11/17/2020 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sammy Davis Morgan opening brief due 01/04/2021. Appellees Croteau, Morgan, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Sacramento Main Jail answering brief due 02/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11882271] (JPD) [Entered: 11/04/2020 03:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.