Michael Alexander v. County of San Mateo, et al
| SAN MATEO MEDICAL CENTER, SAN MATEO COUNTY HEALTH COMMISSION, ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY PROFESSIONALS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, GEORGE PON, BILL GRAHAM, DANIEL REYNOLDS, Lt., CAROLE GROOM, THE HEALTH PLAN OF SAN MATEO, KENNETH TAI, DALY CITY CLINIC, DAVID CANEPA, DAVE PINE, LIGIA ANDRADE ZUNIGA, DON HORSLEY, BARBARA MIAO, SI FRANCE, C. J. KUNNAPPILLY, CEO of San Mateo Medical Center, WARREN SLOCUM, JEANETTE AVILES, STEVE NEEDLES, TERESA GUINGONA FERRER, CARLOS G. BOLANOS and SAN MATEO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS |
| MICHAEL ALEXANDER |
| 20-17189 |
| November 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district courts November 25, 2020 order found that this appeal is frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11927183] (CKP) [Entered: 12/14/2020 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander motion for transcripts. Deficiencies: None [11923749] (NAC) [Entered: 12/11/2020 07:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant Michael Alexander representation statement. [11904420] (NAC) [Entered: 11/24/2020 12:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received Appellant Michael Alexander notice regarding Issues On Appeal. [11904419] (NAC) [Entered: 11/24/2020 12:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Michael Alexander motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11904418] (NAC) [Entered: 11/24/2020 12:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Alexander opening brief due 01/04/2021. Appellees County of San Mateo, et al. answering brief due 02/02/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11884351] (JPD) [Entered: 11/06/2020 10:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
