David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JANE NICOLETT JONES, STOVER, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office (YCSO), SAMPSON, Sgt YCSO at Yavapai Counnty Jail, ROBERTA SCHUSTER, Foreperson Grand Jury at Yavapai Superior Court, Prescott AZ, SHEILA POLK, Superior Court, JACK MATTOX, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, COUNTY OF YAVAPAI and SCOTT MASCHER, YCSO
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GETZEN
Case Number: 20-17242
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant David Getzen. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11952278] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2021 09:13 AM]
December 29, 2020 Filing 6 Filed Appellant David Getzen motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/23/2020. [11948573] (JFF) [Entered: 12/30/2020 11:28 AM]
December 17, 2020 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): Appellant's motion [ # 3 ] for voluntary dismissal is denied because the motion requests dismissal without prejudice. If appellant seeks voluntary dismissal of this appeal, the motion must request dismissal with prejudice. Within 21 days of this order, appellant may file a renewed motion for voluntary dismissal requesting dismissal with prejudice. If a renewed motion is not filed, appellant remains obligated to comply with the November 18, 2020 order. If appellant does not file a renewed motion for voluntary dismissal or a response to the November 18, 2020 order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk shall send a form motion to voluntarily dismissal the appeal to appellant along with this order. [11931615] (CKP) [Entered: 12/17/2020 02:06 PM]
December 14, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant David Getzen motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11929057] (RR) [Entered: 12/15/2020 06:24 PM]
December 10, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant David Getzen motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. [11923376] (JFF) [Entered: 12/10/2020 04:34 PM]
November 18, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11897718] (CKP) [Entered: 11/18/2020 01:05 PM]
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Getzen opening brief due 01/11/2021. [11894649] (JPD) [Entered: 11/16/2020 03:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE NICOLETT JONES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STOVER, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office (YCSO)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMPSON, Sgt YCSO at Yavapai Counnty Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBERTA SCHUSTER, Foreperson Grand Jury at Yavapai Superior Court, Prescott AZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHEILA POLK, Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JACK MATTOX, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF YAVAPAI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SCOTT MASCHER, YCSO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAVID GETZEN
Represented By: David Getzen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?