David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
| M. PERRY, MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JARAMILLO, Sgt., PICKAND, Officer, A. RUSSELL, SHELA SULLIVAN POLK, JESSE LEEDHAM, SCOTT MASCHER, KIMBRELL, Lt., COUNTY OF COCONINO, J. MATTOX, N. HENDERSON, T. SWAIM, COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, OWEN, Sgt., TINA AINLEYS, E. STOVER, B. CARRILLO and JESSICA BARBY |
| DAVID GETZEN |
| 20-17244 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11953943] (JFF) [Entered: 01/06/2021 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11928164] (OC) [Entered: 12/15/2020 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant David Getzen notice regarding law suite; witness protection. [11929090] (RR) [Entered: 12/15/2020 07:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant David Getzen motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11914465] (JFF) [Entered: 12/03/2020 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Getzen opening brief due 01/11/2021. [11894816] (JPD) [Entered: 11/16/2020 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.