Timothy Wilkins v. Scott Kernan, et al
| SCOTT KERNAN, BAYONETTA, S. NELSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WINSAUER, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and M. MARTIN |
| TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS |
| 20-17257 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins letter dated 12/21/2020 re: request docket sheet and case informetion (docket sheet sent). Paper filing deficiency: None. [11950748] (JFF) [Entered: 01/04/2021 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins motion to extend time . Deficiencies: None. [11923348] (JFF) [Entered: 12/10/2020 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/02/2020. [11916965] (QDL) [Entered: 12/07/2020 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11897879] (CKP) [Entered: 11/18/2020 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Timothy Deanore Wilkins opening brief due 01/15/2021. Appellees Bayonetta, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, M. Martin, S. Nelson, State of California and Winsauer answering brief due 02/16/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11896422] (JMR) [Entered: 11/17/2020 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
