Mark Jones v. Senogor, et al
| MARK ANTHONY JONES |
| SENOGOR, Dr., SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL, J. PRUITT and E. VEATER |
| 20-17260 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11952240] (RL) [Entered: 01/05/2021 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11926221] (OC) [Entered: 12/14/2020 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mark Anthony Jones opening brief due 01/15/2021. Appellees J. Pruitt, San Joaquin General Hospital, Senogor and E. Veater answering brief due 02/16/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11899585] (JPD) [Entered: 11/19/2020 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
