Pedro Rodriguez v. H. Longia, et al
HEALTH CARE SERVICES, Undersecretary sued in his/her official capacity, H. LONGIA, Chief Physician and Surgeon, FISHER, In Official Capacity and Warden, RUBEN DIAZ, In Official Capacity and Secretary of CDCR, S. GATES, Chief Medical Appeals and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, In Official Capacity Corporation |
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ |
20-17262 |
November 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11952266] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2021 09:09 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 3 ] to extend time to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Pedro Rodriguez. Appellant Pedro Rodriguez opening brief due 02/19/2021. As there is no appearance by the appellees, briefing will be complete when the opening brief is filed. [11951606] (GS) [Entered: 01/04/2021 03:47 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Pedro Rodriguez motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None. [11949838] (NAC) [Entered: 12/31/2020 02:01 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11901116] (CKP) [Entered: 11/20/2020 12:38 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCES FOR APPELLES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Pedro Rodriguez opening brief due 01/19/2021. [11897560] (WL) [Entered: 11/18/2020 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.