David Reed v. Clark County District Attorney, et al
| DAVID LEVOYD REED |
| S. CLOWERS, CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, EKATERINA DERJAVINA, JEFF ROGAN and PARKER BROOKS |
| 20-17268 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 01/11/2021 addressed to David Levoyd Reed, re: 12/31/2020 mandate [ # 3 ]. Returned envelope notes: refused by inmate, return to sender. Resending to: case files; mail was refused by addressee, address is correct. [11960736] (LA) [Entered: 01/12/2021 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11949375] (QDL) [Entered: 12/31/2020 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); see also Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11921093] (JBS) [Entered: 12/09/2020 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Levoyd Reed opening brief due 01/19/2021. [11899036] (WL) [Entered: 11/19/2020 10:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
