Phillip Carson v. Charles Ryan, et al
| JOHN DOE, D.W. at Eyman Complex, RICHARDSON, Counselor CO3 at ADOC Cook Unit, ERWIN, Legal Monitor at ADOC, TERRY HERNANDEZ, Librarian at Cook Unit, CHARLES L. RYAN, ULIBARRY, Paralegal at ADOC Eyman Complex, KENNETH, Herman and VICKLUND |
| PHILLIP LEE CARSON |
| 20-17308 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Phillip Lee Carson letter dated 12/29/2020 re: Notice to court. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11947497] (RL) [Entered: 12/29/2020 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Phillip Lee Carson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/14/2020. [11928033] (CW) [Entered: 12/15/2020 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11914035] (CKP) [Entered: 12/03/2020 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-17308: Due] ). [11914033] (CKP) [Entered: 12/03/2020 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Phillip Lee Carson letter dated 11/30/2020 re: request for clarification of 11/25/20 order, request for extension of time. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11908607] (CW) [Entered: 11/30/2020 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Phillip Lee Carson opening brief due 12/28/2020. [11906633] (JPD) [Entered: 11/25/2020 12:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
