USA v. Deonte Reed
DEONTE REED |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
20-17315 |
November 27, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Deonte Reed Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 01/21/2021. [11975374] [20-17315] (Thayer, Cristen) [Entered: 01/21/2021 03:46 PM] |
![]() |
Filing 6 Added Attorney Cristen C. Thayer for Appellant Deonte Reed, in case 20-17315. [11928888] (HH) [Entered: 12/15/2020 04:37 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Cristen C. Thayer (Federal Public Defender's Office, District of Nevada - 411 East Bonneville Avenue Suite 250 Las Vegas, NV 89101) for Appellant Deonte Reed. Date of service: 12/15/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11928873] [20-17315] (Thayer, Cristen) [Entered: 12/15/2020 04:33 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner):The district court has not issued or declined to issue a certificate of appealability in this appeal, which appears to arise under 28 U.S.C. 2255. This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue or issues meet the required showing. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. If the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court should state its reasons why a certificate of appealability should not be granted, and the Clerk of the district court shall forward to this court the record with the order denying the certificate. See Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the district court. (MOATT) [11928834] (TSP) [Entered: 12/15/2020 04:11 PM] |
Filing 3 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Entered in error. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. [11907739] [20-17319, 20-17315] (OC) [Entered: 11/27/2020 11:31 AM] |
Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-17315: IFP] ). [11907686] (OC) [Entered: 11/27/2020 11:06 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11907590] (OC) [Entered: 11/27/2020 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Deonte Reed | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: DEONTE REED | |
Represented By: | Amy B. Cleary |
Represented By: | Cristen C. Thayer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Daniel D. Hollingsworth Esquire |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Olson White Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.