Lewis Edison v. LAPD
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| LEWIS EDISON |
| 20-17421 |
| December 15, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the docket reflects that appellant has failed to respond to the court's December 17, 2020 order to show cause. The court sua sponte grants appellant an extension of time to respond to the order to show cause. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file a response to the December 17, 2020 order to show cause. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. The Clerk shall send a copy of the December 17, 2020 order to appellant along with this order. [11978521] (CKP) [Entered: 01/22/2021 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lewis Edison motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11969276] (JFF) [Entered: 01/20/2021 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts judgment was entered on the docket on November 3, 2020. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on December 11, 2020. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11931467] (CKP) [Entered: 12/17/2020 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lewis Edison opening brief due 02/09/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11929334] (JPD) [Entered: 12/16/2020 08:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lewis Edison v. LAPD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: LEWIS EDISON | |
| Represented By: | Lewis Edison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
