Kyko Global, Inc., et al v. Omkar Bhongir
| SYBASE, INC. |
| KYKO GLOBAL GMBH, a Bahamian corporation and KYKO GLOBAL, INC., a Canadian corporation |
| OMKAR BHONGIR, an individual |
| 20-17526 |
| December 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KYKO GLOBAL, INC. V. OMKAR BHONGIR |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Streamlined request [10] by Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc. opening brief due 04/01/2021. Appellee Omkar Bhongir answering brief due 05/03/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12018196] (BG) [Entered: 02/26/2021 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc.. New requested due date is 03/26/2021. [12018143] [20-17526] (Pitt, Keith) [Entered: 02/26/2021 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 02/11/2021, Appellee's report. See order for details. [11992685] (VS) [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 02/11/2021. See order for details. [11992679] (VS) [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 02/04/2021, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 02/02/2021 ). [11969184] (VS) [Entered: 01/20/2021 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 02/02/2021, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11967185] (VS) [Entered: 01/19/2021 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/07/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11955746]. [20-17526] (AD) [Entered: 01/07/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/07/2021. [11955625] [20-17526] (Pitt, Keith) [Entered: 01/07/2021 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Jayson Macyda for party(s) Appellant Kyko Global, Inc. Appellant Kyko Global GmbH, in case 20-17526. [11951789] (RR) [Entered: 01/04/2021 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jayson M. Macyda (Kyko Global Inc. P.O. Box 87491 Canton, MI 48187) for Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc.. Date of service: 01/04/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11950923] [20-17526] (Macyda, Jayson) [Entered: 01/04/2021 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/07/2021. Appellants Kyko Global GmbH and Kyko Global, Inc. opening brief due 03/02/2021. Appellee Omkar Bhongir answering brief due 04/02/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11949731] (RT) [Entered: 12/31/2020 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
