Bradley Monical v. Jeremy Nofziger, et al
| J. ROCHESTER, JUDY GILMORE, CRAIG PRINS, MICHEAL GOWER, TAYLOR, JOHN DOE, 1-3, JEREMY M. NOFZIGER, CHERYL LENEX and R. FOSS |
| BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL |
| 20-35063 |
| January 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, RMG and PJW) [11636345] (RL) [Entered: 03/20/2020 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, RONALD M. GOULD and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11611025] (JBS) [Entered: 02/27/2020 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Bradley William Monical opening brief due 03/27/2020. [11576940] (JPD) [Entered: 01/28/2020 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
