Esther Alley v. MTGLQ Investors, LP, et al
| ESTHER L. ALLEY, AKA Esther Jones-Alley |
| MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP and SELENE FINANCE, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership |
| 20-35076 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ESTHER ALLEY V. MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 29, 2020. The answering brief is due May 29, 2020. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11640387] (JMR) [Entered: 03/24/2020 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ms. Esther L. Alley Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 04/29/2020. Date of service: 03/22/2020. [11637774] [20-35076] (Alley, Esther) [Entered: 03/22/2020 09:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 02/03/2020. [11583920] (RT) [Entered: 02/04/2020 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Esther L. Alley opening brief due 03/30/2020. Appellees MTGLQ Investors, LP and Selene Finance, LP answering brief due 04/29/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11580457] (JBS) [Entered: 01/31/2020 09:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
