David Webb v. Gary Simspon, et al
| STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| DAVID Q. WEBB |
| GARY SIMSPON, Sheriff Kitsap County |
| 20-35109 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail returned on 03/24/2020 addressed to David Q. Webb, re: 03/09/2020 Order [ # 5 ]. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed; unable to forward. Resending to: General Delivery, Port Orchard, WA 98366. [11640451]--[Edited: address updated. 03/24/2020 by SLM] (JBS) [Entered: 03/24/2020 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 Mail returned on 03/09/2020 addressed to David Q. Webb, re: 02/18/2020 order [ # 2 ]. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not in jail, unable to forward. Resending to: 3421 SE Navigation Lane, Port Orchard, WA 98366. [11623299] (LA) [Entered: 03/09/2020 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant David Q. Webb. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11622938] (CKP) [Entered: 03/09/2020 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant David Q. Webb motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/27/2020. [11615186] (CW) [Entered: 03/02/2020 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Mail returned on 02/24/2020 addressed to David Q. Webb, re: 02/10/2020 case opening information [ # 1 ]. Returned envelope notes: not in jail, return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: 3421 SE Navigation Ln, Port Orchard, WA 98366. [11609991] --[Edited: Updated Address. 02/26/2020 by TYL] (LA) [Entered: 02/26/2020 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on February 6, 2020. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [11599888] (CKP) [Entered: 02/18/2020 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/06/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11590979] (JMR) [Entered: 02/10/2020 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
