Ralph Blakely v. Patrick Peterson, et al
| DEBORAH J. TONHOFER, Dr. and PATRICK PETERSON, PAC |
| RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY |
| 20-35120 |
| February 11, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| RALPH BLAKELY V. PATRICK PETERSON |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): Appellants motion for an extension of time (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) to respond to this courts February 24, 2020 order is granted. Appellant shall file a response on or before April 16, 2020. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [11632721] (AF) [Entered: 03/17/2020 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Patrick Peterson and Deborah J. Tonhofer response non-opposing motion ([ # 4 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 03/16/2020. [11630393] [20-35120] (Dibble, Candie) [Entered: 03/16/2020 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ralph Howard Blakely motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 02/24/2020. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/08/2020. [11629607] (QDL) [Entered: 03/13/2020 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Ralph Howard Blakely motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [11611774] (RR) [Entered: 02/27/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11606435] (CKP) [Entered: 02/24/2020 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 03/11/2020. Transcript due 04/10/2020. Appellant Ralph Howard Blakely opening brief due 05/20/2020. Appellees Patrick Peterson and Deborah J. Tonhofer answering brief due 06/19/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11593567] (HC) [Entered: 02/11/2020 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
