Susan Pierson, et al v. Hudson Insurance Company, et al
| JOHN DOES, 1-5000 or more unidentified persons whose law suits have been dismissed based upon the assertion of Indian sovereign immunity in violations of 25 USC 5321 (c) (3) (A) |
| ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, ALLIANT SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, a subsidiary of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., DBA Tribal First and ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware corporation |
| SUSAN PIERSON, a single person |
| 20-35185 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11661733] (LW) [Entered: 04/15/2020 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/10/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11647857] (LW) [Entered: 03/31/2020 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [11628102] (LW) [Entered: 03/12/2020 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Susan Pierson Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/09/2020. Transcript ordered by 03/30/2020. Transcript due 04/28/2020. Appellant Susan Pierson opening brief due 06/08/2020. Appellees Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., Alliant Specialty Insurance Services, Inc., Hudson Insurance Company, Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. and Odyssey Reinsurance Company answering brief due 07/08/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11614433] (JBS) [Entered: 03/02/2020 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Susan Pierson, et al v. Hudson Insurance Company, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation | |
| Represented By: | William W. Spencer Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation | |
| Represented By: | William W. Spencer Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation | |
| Represented By: | William W. Spencer Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ALLIANT SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, a subsidiary of Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., DBA Tribal First | |
| Represented By: | William W. Spencer Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware corporation | |
| Represented By: | William W. Spencer Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SUSAN PIERSON, a single person | |
| Represented By: | William Joseph Johnston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN DOES, 1-5000 or more unidentified persons whose law suits have been dismissed based upon the assertion of Indian sovereign immunity in violations of 25 USC 5321 (c) (3) (A) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
