Roland Ma v. USEDU, et al
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROLAND MA
Case Number: 20-35191
Filed: March 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2020 Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (AWT, MTF and EDM) [11666663] (NAC) [Entered: 04/21/2020 08:19 AM]
April 7, 2020 Filing 7 Received Appellant Mr. Roland Ma Declaration. [11653862] (NAC) [Entered: 04/07/2020 11:07 AM]
April 3, 2020 Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 04/02/2020 ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motions to vacate order or disqualify the Court, to stay this case pending appeal, and to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Dkt. Nos. 45, 47, 49) are DENIED. [11651100] (RL) [Entered: 04/03/2020 12:11 PM]
March 30, 2020 Filing 5 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the February 28, 2020 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11645880] (RT) [Entered: 03/30/2020 02:40 PM]
March 3, 2020 Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Roland Ma. Date of service: 03/03/2020. [11616903] [20-35191] (Ma, Roland) [Entered: 03/03/2020 02:59 PM]
March 3, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Roland Ma Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/03/2020. [11616681] [20-35191] (Ma, Roland) [Entered: 03/03/2020 01:38 PM]
March 3, 2020 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Roland Ma Correspondence: Pending motions in the trial court. Date of service: 02/28/2020 [11616570] [20-35191] (Ma, Roland) [Entered: 03/03/2020 12:51 PM]
March 3, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roland Ma opening brief due 05/04/2020. Appellees U.S. Department of Education and University of Southern California answering brief due 06/04/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11616395] (RT) [Entered: 03/03/2020 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roland Ma v. USEDU, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Represented By: Anne Marie McDowell Hoovler
Represented By: Michael A. Jaeger Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROLAND MA
Represented By: Roland Ma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?